The rise of highly effective new know-how signifies that humanity should confront the danger of its personal demise. The invention of nuclear weaponry, for instance, has already proven simply how shortly humanity’s damaging energy might develop. The atomic bomb was a thousand occasions extra highly effective than typical explosives; many hydrogen bombs had been a thousand occasions extra highly effective once more. Inside many years, the USA and USSR between them had created over ten thousand nuclear bombs. The subsequent technology of weapons of mass destruction, corresponding to bioweapons by engineered viruses, might dramatically enhance humanity’s damaging energy once more—to the purpose that an all-out conflict might threaten all human life.
If Homo sapiens had been to go extinct, what would that imply from a cosmic perspective? Would another species evolve to change into technologically succesful, and uncover science, create artwork, and construct civilization in our place? In the end, I don’t assume that’s in any respect assured. The top of Homo sapiens would due to this fact not merely be an unimaginable loss from our perspective; it could basically change the story of the universe.
It took 200 million years for people to evolve from the primary mammals. The final frequent ancestor of people and chimps was alive solely 8 million years in the past, and there are nonetheless a whole lot of tens of millions of years remaining (a minimum of) till the solar’s rising brightness renders the earth uninhabitable to human-sized animals. Given this, you may assume that, if Homo sapiens went extinct and chimps survived, a technologically succesful species ought to be capable to evolve from chimps, like Planet of the Apes, in 8 million years or much less. Equally, so long as some mammals survived, even when all primates went extinct, shouldn’t we count on a technologically succesful species to evolve inside round 200 million years? This can be a very long time, nevertheless it’s nonetheless simply brief sufficient for such evolution to happen earlier than the earth is not liveable.
This argument is simply too fast. We don’t understand how unlikely the key evolutionary transitions had been, and a few of them—together with, probably, the evolution of a technologically succesful species—had been not possible certainly.
This reasoning is predicated on the Fermi paradox: the paradox that, although there are a minimum of a whole lot of tens of millions of rocky habitable-zone planets within the galaxy, and although our galaxy is 13.5 billion years previous—ample time for an interstellar civilization to unfold broadly throughout it—we see no proof of alien life. If the galaxy is so huge and so previous, why is it not teeming with aliens?
One reply is that one thing about our evolutionary historical past was exceptionally unlikely to happen. Maybe planets which might be conducive for all times are the truth is extraordinarily uncommon (maybe needing to be in a protected zone within the galaxy, with plate tectonics, a big moon, and the fitting chemical composition), or sure steps on the trail from the formation of the earth 4.5 billion years in the past to the evolution of Homo sapiens had been terribly unusual. Probably inconceivable steps embody the creation of the primary replicators from inorganic matter, the evolution of straightforward cells into advanced cells with a nucleus and mitochondria (referred to as “eukaryotes”), the evolution of sexual replica, and probably even the evolution of a species, like Homo sapiens, that’s distinct from different primates by advantage of being unusually clever, hypercooperative, culturally evolving, and able to speech and language. Latest analysis by my colleagues on the Way forward for Humanity Institute suggests that when we correctly account for our uncertainty about simply how unlikely these evolutionary transitions is perhaps, it truly turns into not all that shocking that the universe is empty, although it’s so huge.